<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patient Privacy Rights &#187; EHR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patientprivacyrights.org/tag/ehr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org</link>
	<description>What could your health records reveal? Take control. Protect your privacy, liberty and opportunities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>PPR at ICASM Symposium at Hofstra U.</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/ppr-at-icasm-symposium-at-hofstra-u/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/ppr-at-icasm-symposium-at-hofstra-u/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud based apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hofstra University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICASM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4/24/12 Deborah C. Peel, MD will present on The Ethical Use of Internet Cloud Based Apps and Social Media (ICASM) in Health Care]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/ppr-at-icasm-symposium-at-hofstra-u/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Utah&#8217;s Medical Privacy Breach &#8211; Nearing 1 Million!</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/re-utahs-medical-privacy-breach-nearing-1-million/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/re-utahs-medical-privacy-breach-nearing-1-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health privacy summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can we expect to move forward with electronic health records when privacy and security are not coming first? Encryption was just one reason these records were so easily stolen.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/re-utahs-medical-privacy-breach-nearing-1-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health privacy issues can be resolved without obstructing care</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/health-privacy-issues-can-be-resolved-without-obstructing-care/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/health-privacy-issues-can-be-resolved-without-obstructing-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITECH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The technology is out there. It is time we start demanding that Electronic Health Records be done the right way, starting with privacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/04/health-privacy-issues-can-be-resolved-without-obstructing-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: BCBS Breach in Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/03/re-bcbs-breach-in-tennessee/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/03/re-bcbs-breach-in-tennessee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue cross blue shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITECH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OCR of HHS slapped the wrist of BCBS of Tennessee, but should have done much, much more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/03/re-bcbs-breach-in-tennessee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release: Registration is Open for the 2012 Health Privacy Summit</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/02/press-release-registration-is-open-for-the-2012-health-privacy-summit/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/02/press-release-registration-is-open-for-the-2012-health-privacy-summit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health privacy summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Is There an American Health Privacy Crisis?" Registration is now open!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/02/press-release-registration-is-open-for-the-2012-health-privacy-summit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: 2012: Time for Action on Health Privacy</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/01/re-2012-time-for-action-on-health-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/01/re-2012-time-for-action-on-health-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT Committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deven McGraw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal strategic health it plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leader of the ONC appointed HIT Policy Committee speaks out on HHS/ONC's lack of action regarding health privacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2012/01/re-2012-time-for-action-on-health-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: David Cameron ready to put chunks of NHS up for sale, says Labour</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/12/re-david-cameron-ready-to-put-chunks-of-nhs-up-for-sale-says-labour/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/12/re-david-cameron-ready-to-put-chunks-of-nhs-up-for-sale-says-labour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Health System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UK Prime minister will outline plans to encourage the National Health System ties with industry and fuel innovation, including £180m catalyst fund]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/12/re-david-cameron-ready-to-put-chunks-of-nhs-up-for-sale-says-labour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes to EU Data Protection Directive Will Likely Impact U.S.-Based Companies</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/12/changes-to-eu-data-protection-directive-will-likely-impact-u-s-based-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/12/changes-to-eu-data-protection-directive-will-likely-impact-u-s-based-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITECH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed EU Directive gives patients more control over medical privacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/12/changes-to-eu-data-protection-directive-will-likely-impact-u-s-based-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Health Record Security Concerns Are Global</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/electronic-health-record-security-concerns-are-global/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/electronic-health-record-security-concerns-are-global/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls/Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sailpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia and the UK are one phase ahead of the United States, already seeing results of EHRs lacking privacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/electronic-health-record-security-concerns-are-global/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford medical records posted on public website, now removed</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/stanford-medical-records-posted-on-public-website-now-removed/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/stanford-medical-records-posted-on-public-website-now-removed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Stanford breach proves that along with health IT there must be stronger privacy protections than what is currently in place.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/stanford-medical-records-posted-on-public-website-now-removed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford Hospital investigating how patient data ended up on homework help website</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/stanford-hospital-investigating-how-patient-data-ended-up-on-homework-help-website/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/stanford-hospital-investigating-how-patient-data-ended-up-on-homework-help-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health privacy summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The experts agree, HIPAA is inadequate. Breaches like this only prove that over and over again. It is time to do something about it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/stanford-hospital-investigating-how-patient-data-ended-up-on-homework-help-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patient Data Posted Online in Major Breach of Privacy</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/patient-data-posted-online-in-major-breach-of-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/patient-data-posted-online-in-major-breach-of-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health privacy summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanford medical breach shows just what experts have been saying for a while: privacy standards are insufficient in electronic health records today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/09/patient-data-posted-online-in-major-breach-of-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The road to electronic health records is lined with data thieves</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/08/the-road-to-electronic-health-records-is-lined-with-data-thieves/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/08/the-road-to-electronic-health-records-is-lined-with-data-thieves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHR Report Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescriptions & Pharmacies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point: current data security and privacy are totally inadequate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/08/the-road-to-electronic-health-records-is-lined-with-data-thieves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Health Information Isn’t Secure But Don’t Blame EHRs</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/07/your-health-information-isn%e2%80%99t-secure-but-don%e2%80%99t-blame-ehrs/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/07/your-health-information-isn%e2%80%99t-secure-but-don%e2%80%99t-blame-ehrs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Privacy Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data miners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Information Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=4100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those consent forms you sign at the doctor’s office… yeah, you should pay attention to the fine print. You may be giving permission to insurance companies, drug makers, and data aggregators to access your health information, regardless of how or where it’s stored.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/07/your-health-information-isn%e2%80%99t-secure-but-don%e2%80%99t-blame-ehrs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mostashari mindful of HIT stakeholder tension</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/04/mostashari-mindful-of-hit-stakeholder-tension/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/04/mostashari-mindful-of-hit-stakeholder-tension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT Committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farzad Mostashari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT Policy Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national coordinator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=3957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He will listen attentively to stakeholder interests and is aware of the tensions among them. However, his first objective will be the public interest.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2011/04/mostashari-mindful-of-hit-stakeholder-tension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsafe data in Texas</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/10/unsafe-data-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/10/unsafe-data-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Bulldog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de-identified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzanne Batchelor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=3701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas is handling patient data unsafely, and knowingly so.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/10/unsafe-data-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments: ONC studying risks of de-identified patient records</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/10/comments-onc-studying-risks-of-de-identified-patient-records/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/10/comments-onc-studying-risks-of-de-identified-patient-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de-identified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-identification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=3696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you government for determining my risk level, now please do not release my health data.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/10/comments-onc-studying-risks-of-de-identified-patient-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And TX isn&#8217;t the only state selling your information&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/and-tx-isnt-the-only-state-selling-your-information/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/and-tx-isnt-the-only-state-selling-your-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Theft/Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Bulldog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de-identified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzanne Batchelor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=3684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hospital Patient Privacy Sacrificed as State Agency Sells or Gives Away Data]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/and-tx-isnt-the-only-state-selling-your-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed United States medical privacy rules deemed inadequate</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/proposed-united-states-medical-privacy-rules-deemed-inadequate/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/proposed-united-states-medical-privacy-rules-deemed-inadequate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=3658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An outsiders view on how the U.S. is doing in Health IT, and how PRIVACY is leading the conversation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/proposed-united-states-medical-privacy-rules-deemed-inadequate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New HIPAA rules need more clarification</title>
		<link>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/new-hipaa-rules-need-more-clarification/</link>
		<comments>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/new-hipaa-rules-need-more-clarification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PPR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs/HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deborah peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patientprivacyrights.org/?p=3666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Industry argues the rules are too strict, while we have already seen privacy enhancing technologies that can do the job.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patientprivacyrights.org/2010/09/new-hipaa-rules-need-more-clarification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

